Search results

In all honesty, from the time I joined, I've seen activity diminish shortly after (especially after Randall discontinued the line) There has been a bit of a revitalization when Synergy was announced, but that died down pretty quick

For the RT 2/50 the heat mostly comes out the back, for there's where the tubes are placed (and freely accessible) So there wouldn't be much issues with heat, placing another unit on top of it

My first guess would be to get some kind of poweramp simulation going as well Tone is the sum of all parts, and you're missing a piece

I had a 5751 JAN GE once, pricey little bugger ..then the frigging bulb failed within just a few weeks use :x while the various cheap *** MiC pre's I use are still going strong to this day

Your RT2/50 has 2 channels, you can make one louder and use it as a solo boost

Still have an unemployed stock SL+ lying here, maybe time to soup it up a little Question is: in what? I'm leaning towards something preferably with lots of gain on tap but not compressed Where palm-muting rather gives a crackle than a rumble So I was thinking in the Salvation camp either...

Looking at the front Left is V1, right is V2 But also don't forget V1 in the amp you are using

I actually at the time had the stock treadplate as well and there simply was no comparison, the UL was like Santana with BBQ sauce over it while the treadplate was a bland Rectifier I think a close module these days for the UL is a Salvation Legend (The UL is now a Angel+ and the Treadplate a...

For some reason, I still miss my old Randall Ultra Lead The lack of higher range clarity killed it when combined with my other mods, but it's smokey thick character was by itself a pleasure to hear

The answer is quite obvious: "Money, dear boy"

Your own ears can fool you Best way to find out, is record whenever you play over a period of time then, when you get one of those "bad tone days" you can reference to earlier sessions and have certainty if it's your ears or the gear

ilearn Do you unplug/plug in the footswitch with the RM4 ON?

Hey, it's yours to do as you want with it, as is your free time you don't 'owe' us :wink:

Now, it may just be my taste, but in 800-mode, it certainly isn't some gainmonster

Personally, I would change that Series 500 rack for something more guitarsetup/gig friendly

You are correct, I was looking at the wrong Moog Delay (the MF104 pedal, not the series 500 module) In which case my advise is void

If the RF4 were to send Continuous Control messages instead of Program Change it would only relay Control Changes #56 - #59 (channels 1-4 on the RM4, IF operated in CC mode) None of these seem to be used by the Moog, Bypass for that is found on CC #80 What you could use is a Voodoo labs...

after almost 20 years of GAS ...I still cannot fathom the corksniffing of an all-tube signal path "Boo, the JCM-900 uses diode clipping, Booooo!!!" "Well, WTF are you boosting that JCM-800 with?"

You need a software update I believe

Do you have all the same tubes in the chassis section of the RM4? I would understand the pre loop to be thinner, since it misses an extra tube