Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Modular Amps
Egnater / Randall Modular Amps
Anybody give me some insight RM100 vs RT2/50
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Synergy/MTS Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JeffHenneman" data-source="post: 133451" data-attributes="member: 1476"><p>Wow tbag that is a lot of mods to the rm100. </p><p></p><p>I have always felt that modules sound the most "natural" in the rm100 heads, BUT you hit it right on the head about the pronounced mids. I love using the mts heads for recording but they just don't have the openness of other amps for live playing. I mostly using them to layer tracks and not the main sound cause of that mid presence.</p><p></p><p>I also have a rack setup aswell. So I have done lots of comparison between the m4 and rm4 paired with the rt2/50, mesa 2:90 and fryette 2:90:2. I have also ran my preamps thru a few heads also; mesa mark v, peavey triple xx II, and 6505. Out of the power amps, I like the mesa 2:90 the best.</p><p>When running the preamps thru other heads they have the openness that those heads have, so I definatelly know that its the randall heads that are lacking in that department. One thing to point out is that when running them thru other amps they get a lot of the amps characteristics. </p><p></p><p>I install the salvo boards on both heads and I am not too big of a fan. To me the amp lose some fullness. I am gonna experiment some more with them but maybe they are just not my cup of tea.</p><p></p><p>I really wish there was some mods we could do to open up the poweramp on the rm100.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JeffHenneman, post: 133451, member: 1476"] Wow tbag that is a lot of mods to the rm100. I have always felt that modules sound the most "natural" in the rm100 heads, BUT you hit it right on the head about the pronounced mids. I love using the mts heads for recording but they just don't have the openness of other amps for live playing. I mostly using them to layer tracks and not the main sound cause of that mid presence. I also have a rack setup aswell. So I have done lots of comparison between the m4 and rm4 paired with the rt2/50, mesa 2:90 and fryette 2:90:2. I have also ran my preamps thru a few heads also; mesa mark v, peavey triple xx II, and 6505. Out of the power amps, I like the mesa 2:90 the best. When running the preamps thru other heads they have the openness that those heads have, so I definatelly know that its the randall heads that are lacking in that department. One thing to point out is that when running them thru other amps they get a lot of the amps characteristics. I install the salvo boards on both heads and I am not too big of a fan. To me the amp lose some fullness. I am gonna experiment some more with them but maybe they are just not my cup of tea. I really wish there was some mods we could do to open up the poweramp on the rm100. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Modular Amps
Egnater / Randall Modular Amps
Anybody give me some insight RM100 vs RT2/50
Top