Eptesicus79
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2010
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 0
Question for all you gear-heads out there..
I have been playing through a Marshall EL34 100/100 power amp for a couple years now. It is my first tube power amp, but Im finding that it might be much more than I need, which is mainly home recording. I was wondering if anyone has had any comparable experience with the RT2/50?
Pros about the Marshall is it sounds great, & looks real pretty too. But Ive been told that to get the full tone from the tubes, you need to crank them up. Well at 100w per bloc, I cant even bring it past 1pm or the windows will probably shatter! The fact that its 3U rack spaces & weighs in at about 50lbs doesnt help much, but its built real solid.
As for the RT2/50, I really like the bias option & having two different sets of tubes. Plus, 50w per channel might be a little more reasonable to deal with at home. So, I guess my real concern is how different the tone would be from the Marshall.
Thanks in advance!
I have been playing through a Marshall EL34 100/100 power amp for a couple years now. It is my first tube power amp, but Im finding that it might be much more than I need, which is mainly home recording. I was wondering if anyone has had any comparable experience with the RT2/50?
Pros about the Marshall is it sounds great, & looks real pretty too. But Ive been told that to get the full tone from the tubes, you need to crank them up. Well at 100w per bloc, I cant even bring it past 1pm or the windows will probably shatter! The fact that its 3U rack spaces & weighs in at about 50lbs doesnt help much, but its built real solid.
As for the RT2/50, I really like the bias option & having two different sets of tubes. Plus, 50w per channel might be a little more reasonable to deal with at home. So, I guess my real concern is how different the tone would be from the Marshall.
Thanks in advance!