insightibanez
Well-known member
I'm getting ready to invest in some speakers but I'm on the fence on which ones to get. Can anybody give some Pros or Cons on both or recommend one over the other? -Thanks
crankyrayhanky said:I have Marshall 4x12 with v30s and also a mesa oversized 2x12 with v30s
I read these speakers get criticized sometimes, but they sound good to me, and there's a long history of lots of pros using them
I may sell 2 or 4 of them to get ZW EVs, just for variety sake ...so if you're looking for v30s, we can work out Arizona deal
all are 16ohms
We can meet in Sedona!
As far as I know, the Super V's will have a richer, fuller bottom end and softer highs that don't pierce, but can still cut in the mix.
V30's are the classic, but can have ice pick-y highs.
IMHO, The Lynch cab is just more musically rich than other cabs. A LP, Plexi Module, a 808 style boost and a LB cab is the thickest tone....surreal said:I'm waiting on a lynch box 100w head to arrive.
I have a quad load with v30's and greenbacks in an x arrangement.
My question is I've heard that Georges cabinet sounds awesome, and i would assume his modules would have been designed and tone tested thru this cabinet.
Trouble is i would have to sell my cab to purchase Georges cab.
Thing is I'm not typically searching for George's tone , just Like everyone else trying to get the best tone available from this rig.
I'm going with a Blackface,Plexi and Grail to start with as far as modules go
Anyone shed any light on this ?
khingpynn said:Just my two cents...
I've used Vintage 30's and they are great. agressive upper mids, nice tight lower mids, the highs can be a little harsh but thats amp/guitar dependant and can be dialed out most times.
I was a Greenback user for years, nice vocal like mids, excellent top, don't expect a huge bottom, excellent tone from speaker breakup.
There is that signature mid hump... love it or hate it. Personally love it for lead work but not my cup of tea for rythm.
I've tried X patterns, offset patterns, mixed speaker size, you name it. At one point I owned over two dozen different speakers of various make and size.
IMHO the Super V is the benchmark for a great speaker. I use them exclusivly. Every amp I own sounds better with them.
Extended tight bottoms with NO mud, perfect lower mids, well focused upper mids right in the sweet spot ( no mid hump like the Greenback ), and perfect highs that never go harsh, the breakup from the speaker is second to none... sweeter than a greenback with excellent high end sparkle. For a high wattage speaker they break up early.
Very touch responsive to dynamics. A very true speaker that you simply can not hide behind.
To my ears the Super V does something no other speaker I've heard does. It can be agressive yet sweet, equally great at rythm and lead tones, clean to barely breaking up, mid to high gain. When pushed and pummeled with high gain most "pretty" speakers just go to mud the Super V's just lap it up and pushes the tone over the top... not compressing to much and maitaining an open sound.
They are a well conceived nock off of a Fane speaker and I feel this just goes to show what a great ear George Lynch has.
Yup I'm all about the Super V.
That being said, I'm surprised no one has mentioned Hellatone 60s...It's the same speaker except the Hellatone is broken in somewhat, so it sounds good right out of the gate and it's less expensive ($99).riff man said:that being said i blast my music through a XL cab loaded with V30's and think they are the sex!!! and i don't get any kind of "ice pick highs" that some speak of.. but then again .. i've broke my cab/speakers in super hard over the last 2 yrs or more ..that could be a difference as well ... ...just saying....
E>T.
SuicideCircus said:khingpynn said:Just my two cents...
I've used Vintage 30's and they are great. agressive upper mids, nice tight lower mids, the highs can be a little harsh but thats amp/guitar dependant and can be dialed out most times.
I was a Greenback user for years, nice vocal like mids, excellent top, don't expect a huge bottom, excellent tone from speaker breakup.
There is that signature mid hump... love it or hate it. Personally love it for lead work but not my cup of tea for rythm.
I've tried X patterns, offset patterns, mixed speaker size, you name it. At one point I owned over two dozen different speakers of various make and size.
IMHO the Super V is the benchmark for a great speaker. I use them exclusivly. Every amp I own sounds better with them.
Extended tight bottoms with NO mud, perfect lower mids, well focused upper mids right in the sweet spot ( no mid hump like the Greenback ), and perfect highs that never go harsh, the breakup from the speaker is second to none... sweeter than a greenback with excellent high end sparkle. For a high wattage speaker they break up early.
Very touch responsive to dynamics. A very true speaker that you simply can not hide behind.
To my ears the Super V does something no other speaker I've heard does. It can be agressive yet sweet, equally great at rythm and lead tones, clean to barely breaking up, mid to high gain. When pushed and pummeled with high gain most "pretty" speakers just go to mud the Super V's just lap it up and pushes the tone over the top... not compressing to much and maitaining an open sound.
They are a well conceived nock off of a Fane speaker and I feel this just goes to show what a great ear George Lynch has.
Yup I'm all about the Super V.
My thoughts to the T....... This guy has some time with the Super V....
Enter your email address to join: