kylendm
Well-known member
So I've owned the Terrier for a while now and I've always liked it. It just has a great amount of flexibility and a different feel from the other high gain modules I have. I also own a Fryette Sig:X and I've never compared them back to back so I figured I'd give it a shot. I sent my RM4 with the Terrier into the FX Loop Return of the Sig:X and A/Bed them.
I honestly can't believe how close it is to the real thing. You can dial it in to ALMOST the exact tone.
I thought that the power amp of the sig:x might have been what was doing it but you can get extremely close with the Fryette 2/50/2 also. Granted it was a lot closer running into the real thing since the Sig uses KT88s and a Rectifier tube but I'm just shocked at how close Salvation got with this one.
If anyone is interested in the Sig:X and doesn't want to drop a lot of money, the Terrier will definitely get you there and then some since the Terrier also does a really nice clean tone too.
Just felt like chiming in on this and I might even make a demo of it if anyone is interested.
I honestly can't believe how close it is to the real thing. You can dial it in to ALMOST the exact tone.
I thought that the power amp of the sig:x might have been what was doing it but you can get extremely close with the Fryette 2/50/2 also. Granted it was a lot closer running into the real thing since the Sig uses KT88s and a Rectifier tube but I'm just shocked at how close Salvation got with this one.
If anyone is interested in the Sig:X and doesn't want to drop a lot of money, the Terrier will definitely get you there and then some since the Terrier also does a really nice clean tone too.
Just felt like chiming in on this and I might even make a demo of it if anyone is interested.