GtrGeorge! said:Link no workie
even 2nd link ...no worky
They need to do that on the RM50, and call it the RM52.
gtr475 said:They need to do that on the RM50, and call it the RM52.
Maybe that is what's going to happen to all MTS line of amps...
4 modules on a "RM52". 6 modules on a "RM102" :shock:
Now that would be cool.
And my young one I think the RM1250 would be enough for ANY discriminating cover or studio guitarist when it comes out (and paired with a Ground Control and an outboard MIDI processor is gonna be THE most versatile amp EVER, and probably the heaviest)hyenik said:RM54 and RM106 or?
but I don?t think so, RM100 is already heavy as hell (for my old back
So you haven't tried getting a RM100 and pulling out 2 tubes?GtrGeorge! said:thanks..I saw the pic...WOW!
Really cool looking. This should eat the tiny competitor for breakfast!
Nice..and so useful for so many players. This and a good cab..done deal.
For me, my wet dream is still a 3 module MTS combo amp with 50 watts (El34...thank you!!!)
Until that day..I am a man of constant sorrow.
GtrGeorge
Smokey said:So you haven't tried getting a RM100 and pulling out 2 tubes?GtrGeorge! said:thanks..I saw the pic...WOW!
Really cool looking. This should eat the tiny competitor for breakfast!
Nice..and so useful for so many players. This and a good cab..done deal.
For me, my wet dream is still a 3 module MTS combo amp with 50 watts (El34...thank you!!!)
Until that day..I am a man of constant sorrow.
GtrGeorge
Cheers
_________________
RD/Steve
"stay thirsty my friends..."
Enter your email address to join: